It seems like a class with only static functions should have a private
constructor, since you shouldn't need to create an instance of the
class.
For example:
class AllStatic
{
private AllStatic() {} // No sense instantiating one of these
public static Method1() {...}
}
Or maybe you should allow the user to create an instance. It really
shouldn't hurt anything.
What do you think?
Is there a special name for a class with all static members?
Thanks...David
You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
