Thank you for the answer.
But Why The
al.AddRange ...
al.Sort();
al.Reverse();
Console.WriteLine(al.BinarySearch("this"));
displays -7
al.AddRange ...
al.Sort();
al.Reverse();
al.Reverse();
Console.WriteLine(al.BinarySearch("this"));
displays 4 ?
The different is just one more al.Reverse().
On 4月27日, 下午4时47分, Jamie Fraser <[email protected]> wrote:
> Generally when using a BinarySort, a negative number indicates that
> the element wasn't found. The reason for the negative -X rather than
> -1 is because the sort returns the element it "got to" during its
> search before it realised that the element wasn't present.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 3:25 AM, Jingle <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > I'm learning MCTS 70-536. These are some codes from Chapter 4:
>
> > ArrayList al = new ArrayList();
> > al.AddRange(new string[] { "Hello", "world", "this", "is", "a",
> > "test" });
> > Console.WriteLine(al.BinarySearch("this"));
>
> > It displays 2 . but when I change the code to this:
>
> > ArrayList al = new ArrayList();
> > al.AddRange(new string[] { "Hello", "world", "this", "is", "a",
> > "test" });
> > al.Sort();
> > al.Reverse();
> > Console.WriteLine(al.BinarySearch("this"));
>
> > It displays -7 . (yet when I add one more "al.Reverse()" into the
> > code, it displays 4 )
>
> > I've tested that only the code above gets a nagative number, other
> > groups by some "al.Sort" and some "al.Reverse" all display a right
> > number.
> > Anyone who can help to explain ? Thanks!
>
> > --
> > Subscription
> > settings:http://groups.google.com/group/dotnetdevelopment/subscribe?hl=en
