according to theory you are right it should be fired On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 8:30 AM, analysis_junky <[email protected]>wrote:
> Not sure, but that should be easy enough to test. My hypothesis is > that thread B would fire even though thread A has called > Thread.Sleep(int). > > On Apr 21, 12:44 pm, DaTurk <[email protected]> wrote: > > I was always under the impression a event was just a multicast delgate > > under the hood, is this correct? > > > > Another question I have is if I have several recipients of an event, > > do they get notified sequentually? > > > > And if they get fired sequentually, do they happen on the same thread? > > > > The reason I'm asking is if I have an Event with several recipients += > > on it, and the first recipient gets notified but holds the thread, say > > with a sleep, or a lock, or for any reason ... will this block the > > rest of the recipients getting notified? > > > > Thanks in advance > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "DotNetDevelopment, VB.NET, C# .NET, ADO.NET, ASP.NET, XML, XML > Web Services,.NET Remoting" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/dotnetdevelopment?hl=en?hl=en > or visit the group website at http://megasolutions.net > -- Ravindra kumar delhi -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DotNetDevelopment, VB.NET, C# .NET, ADO.NET, ASP.NET, XML, XML Web Services,.NET Remoting" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/dotnetdevelopment?hl=en?hl=en or visit the group website at http://megasolutions.net
