Frankly, I don't see enough rationale here to merit the creation of a Data Transfer Object (DTO). A Dataset/Datatable would have been just sufficient and would have provided an (offline) table ready to be used/ modified.
On Aug 15, 12:39 pm, DotNet Newbie <[email protected]> wrote: > Just an update, I decided to go with Stephen's suggestion since the > Access database will eventually go away. Also I had to do extensive > data "massaging" before the data could be moved to the SQL db. With > the class I could do just that. > > Thanks to both of you for your suggestions! > > Jana > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DotNetDevelopment, VB.NET, C# .NET, ADO.NET, ASP.NET, XML, XML Web Services,.NET Remoting" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/dotnetdevelopment?hl=en?hl=en or visit the group website at http://megasolutions.net
