I would tend to agree. If you look at the page source, you will still see the asp.net tags (<asp:TextBox> etc) in it. It is the job of the ASP.NET process to compile this into HTML output and pass it to the webserver.
To put it simply, the problem is not with the mode of publishing, but with the .NET installation on the server. Make sure that if this is an IIS server, you have registered ASP.NET within IIS. On Sep 8, 1:19 pm, "Slava K." <[email protected]> wrote: > I think you need a web server that supports asp.net, just search on google > something like: "free asp.net server" -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DotNetDevelopment, VB.NET, C# .NET, ADO.NET, ASP.NET, XML, XML Web Services,.NET Remoting" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/dotnetdevelopment?hl=en?hl=en or visit the group website at http://megasolutions.net
