On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 13:45 -0400, John Peacock wrote:

> FWIW, I think that the default dovecot-sample.conf should not have
> PAM 
> support enabled by default (just comment it out).  When I applied by 
> local diffs to the new conf file, I missed out on that and had to 
> immediately edit it out in order to bring up dovecot; not a big deal
> but 
> the sample configuration should more or less work out of the box for
> an 
> absolutely minimal configuration (and some limited definition of
> "work")... 

Many people think using PAM by default is the minimal configuration. :)

Anyway, I won't change this for v1.0 at least.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to