On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 15:41 -0400, Justin McAleer wrote: > > In my testing of using sql dictionary for quota, it appears pretty > buggy. Are you aware of such problems? Either way, would you consider > reliable dictionary quota support a target for 1.1?
Actually I think I did it today. The biggest problem with v1.0 implementation was that expunges could be counted multiple times if multiple processes were running. I ran imaptest for a while with 10 connections and in 3 different tests the dict quota always contained correct values, so I thought it was probably working. > I did find that it > seemed to blow maildir++ away in terms of performance. We have a few > really large maildirs that basically choke when quota is enabled > using > maildir++ (200,000+ messages). Even if filenames had the ,S=size? Another problem is that the quota is read, and possibly recalculated, much more often than is really necessary.. I haven't fixed that yet in v1.1.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
