-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Scott Silva schrieb: > Robert Schetterer spake the following on 4/23/2007 6:32 AM: >> Wilkinson, Alex schrieb: >>> 0n Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 08:53:09AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote: >>> >I *hate* email disclaimers... >>> Our Exchange servers addthat footer to every email that goes out. >>> There is nothing I can do to stop it :( >>> -aW >>> IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence >>> Organisation and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the CRIMES >>> ACT 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to >>> contact the sender and delete the email. >> Be aware, its now law in the EU to include signatures to buisness mails, >> after all youre right other disclaimers doesnt make sense by blowing up >> mails >> > But isn't the law that the signatures be the info you would find on a company > letterhead, not an un-enforcible legalese disclaimer? > > I would think the legal signature would be something like ; > > "IMPORTANT: This email originated from the Australian Defence Organisation > City, Province/State , Australia > Telephone > Fax > Other administrative info > Maybe legal incorporation or business numbers" > Hi yes, something like this , is what i meant, i dont wanted to discuss or flame the sense of disclaimers signatures here anyway, my intention was just to make clear that some kind of signatures or/and disclaimers may now be a "must have" in some regions in some cases.
- -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen Best Regards Robert Schetterer https://www.schetterer.org Munich/Bavaria/Germany -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGLPAofGH2AvR16oERAmhhAJ47C8g+jqAYJ/zyOP+B+cZBYN/TogCcCSIf 3gmVRvr42fq/6aytiQmhpTI= =HbF+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
