On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:01 +0000, Daniel Watts wrote: > >> Shouldn't Dovecot be able to recover from this? > >> > > > > It does, that's why there are those "marked corrupted" errors. But it > > probably does cause the current operation to fail. v1.1 handles this by > > logging the error but continuing anyway, so the operation shouldn't > > fail. > > > > If you mean that it repeatedly fails with the same error, then the same > > error condition is created over and over again for some reason. > > > Yes it repeatedly fails until I manually remove the index files. However > after removing them it does not seem to reoccur.
The next time this happens, could you send me: - dovecot.index - dovecot.index.log* - dovecot-uidlist - ls new/ cur/ None of those should contain any sensitive information.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
