On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 20:32 +0100, Anders wrote: > Steffen Kaiser wrote: > > Well, it's all open source, did you look at it? It shouldn't be too hard > > to just ignore the result of include, no? > > > > Yeah, I did look. > > I sure could patch something together. Before doing that, though, I > hoped to be enlightened with an official way, so I would not have to > drag around obscure modifications.
I don't think there will be any upstream modifications at least: SIEVE implementations MUST handle missing scripts being referenced via an includes in an existing script. An error MUST be generated when a missing included script is descovered during execution. Then again the include draft expired over a year ago.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
