On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Feb 27, 2008, at 4:22 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
I can't argue with that logic but documenting it in a wiki or INSTALL or
including the patches with the distribution might be more agreeable.
Why are you people still using so old gcc versions?
As an observer, I'd like to remark that it's amazing that
twentiety-century known-broken non-releases
<http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-2.96.html> of GCC are in use in 2008.
I'm honestly curious what keeps you guys on them.
-- Asheesh.
--
Maybe you can't buy happiness, but these days you can certainly charge it.
