Hello Timo, From: "Timo Sirainen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 11:36 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: > So I guess the question is if Dovecot should first synchronize the > mailbox and only then perform EXPUNGE. This is allowed by IMAP, but it > would require Dovecot to do two mailbox synchronizations for each > EXPUNGE. I'd rather not do that but maybe Outlook is big enough user > that it should be changed... Or of course Dovecot could just do another EXPUNGE if the first one noticed that some messages got \Deleted flags. I'll add to v1.1 todo list.
That would be nice. The delete and expunge commands were indeed issued by different IMAP-connections.
Was the 1.0.7 version handling the updates differently? Because I never had such delay with another account (different server, same dovecot configuration, same Outlook installation).
Best wishes Eugene
