> Problem I see is that an external script that *unconditionally* relaunches > dovecot could be a terribly problem. It's better for dovecot to do it > itself in this particular failure, because it's the only one who knows that > it was just a date issue, and relaunching is safe.
But as Timo has explained, simply relaunching might *not* be safe. johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
