On Jun 11, 2008, at 9:43 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 6/11/2008 1:58 PM, Anders wrote:Steve Fosdick wrote:What is the status of dbox in dovecot 1.1 please?I asked the same question some time ago, with no real answers,> > http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2008-March/029260.html Thats not true... maybe you missed Timos response? See below: On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 10:05 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> On Mar 5, 2008, at 10:02 PM, Anders wrote: >>>>> I am contemplating migrating from maildir to dbox. However, I wonder >>> about the maturity of the dbox code, as it appears to not be widely>>> used. Does anybody have some success stories? >> There's one bug left that I'd like to fix before v1.1.0, but you >> probably won't run into it without stress testing.. > This is now fixed in hg as well, so the next release should have a > perfectly working dbox, or at least there are no bugs left that I'm > aware of. :) So, according to Timo, it should be working 'perfectly'... :)
*SHOULD* .. But no guarantees of course :) After writing that mail I've found and fixed a couple of problems. Most (all?) of them were related to accessing maildir files generated by the quick maildir-to- dbox conversion.
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part