Re: [Dovecot] Multiple quota roots with quota-fs backend

[Ralf Becker]

Timo Sirainen schrieb am 21.07.2008 02:03:

But most people haven't needed it, so it would be unnecessary extra
checks for them. Wonder if it'd be better to just let them have the
extra check or add a configuration option..

I'm also a bit worried that if this check was always done it would break
some existing setup where the check doesn't work correctly for some
reason.

I see the point :-)



./src/plugins/quota/quota.c:


Right?

So the meaning will change from
  dovecot-1.1.1: 'noenforcing' => report, but don't enforce
to
  dovecot-1.1.2: 'noenforcing' => don't report and don't enforce

Or do I miss something?



-------------------------------------------------
(*)
 plugin {
   quota  = fs:INBOX:mount=/var/mail
   quota2  = fs:home:noenforcing:mount=/home/h1
 }


--
______________________________________________________________________

  Dipl.-Inform. (FH) Ralf Becker     Rechenzentrum (r/ft) der FH Trier
  (Network|Mail|Web|Firewall)           University of applied sciences
  Administrator                           Schneidershof, D-54293 Trier

    Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]                    Fon: +49 651 8103 499
     Web: http://www.fh-trier.de/~beckerr        Fax: +49 651 8103 214
  PubKey: http://www.fh-trier.de/~beckerr     Crypto: GnuPG, S/MIME
______________________________________________________________________

  Wenn Gott gewollt haette, dass E-Mail in HTML geschrieben wuerden,
  endeten Gebete traditionell mit </amen>. (Tom Listen)

Looking over the new function 'quota_root_is_visible' let's me think, that Grandy Fu's original solution (*) should work then, because 'noenforcing' does cover not only quota checking but also quota root reporting. So 'noenforcing' is then just an alias for 'hidden'.

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature