On 8/12/2008, Josef Liaka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
But it sends vacation messages with null envelope sender, which is in
my opinion undesirable,
It is not only desirable, as Stephan already pointed out to someone
else, it is per the spec:
"This behavior is implemented as such on purpose. From RFC5230
(http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5230.txt):
5.1. SMTP MAIL FROM Address
The SMTP MAIL FROM address of the message envelope SHOULD be set to
<>. [...]"
> because many vacation messages are caught in spam filters.
So what? Many people consider them spam already.
Please don't muck with things like this unless you have a really, really
good reason...
--
Best regards,
Charles
