> Did you also notice my "Initial support for shared > mailboxes" message from yesterday? No, unfortunately I didn't; I only joined the mailing list on the day I sent this message. It sounds like it could be relevant to the topic though; could you provide me with a breakdown of what it is about?
> not very well tested Well, I'll be inevitably running some stress tests myself, but yes, including it in the official test chain once it is done would be a fundamentally good thing to do. Would a facility to modify global ACLs through IMAP commands be required or of any use at all? From what I gather, nothing like that is mentioned anywhere in the RFC. As it is now, I am having the writing commands influence only the referenced mailboxes' local ACLs - however, should global ACLs be present, this is bound to result in somewhat irrational-seeming behaviour - should I go through with my current approach of storing the ACL data as present in acl_object_vfile.rights into the local dovecot-acl file, global ACLs would, on the one hand, wind up being copied into it - on the other hand, from the client's perspective, the ACLs defined by the global file would appear to be irremovable. What should I do about this? Regards, Matvey