On 10/27/2008 12:29 PM, Scott Silva wrote: >> Maybe 'dovecot -n' could also provide basic system info (it already does >> for the dovecot version)? I know the command varies depending on said >> architecture, but for most systems it could probably easily figure this out? >> >> Just a thought...
> Maybe it could brew you a nice cup of tea also? > > Come on... Timo can't do *all* of your work. ;-D Actually, I was thinking more along the lines of making it *easier* for Timo (in the long run)... but yeah, I know what you mean... ;) The fact is the more info dovecot -n provides for troubleshooting purposes, the easier it will be to spot the problem without anyone having to ask for additional info. For example, it would be nice if dovecot-sql contents (if any) were included in output of dovecot -n too (and Timo has mentioned that someday it will be)... -- Best regards, Charles
