On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:45:13 -0500 Stewart Dean <sd...@bard.edu> wrote:
> Is there a simple robust IMAP client to replace Pine (which I *think* > is no longer supported)? GUI or TTY session? > > I'm wondering if there is something we can tell users to use when > Things Are Dire. GUI would be better since it removes one of the few > remaining reasons for a logon server GUIwise, I have been using Sylpheed for years, both personally and professionally, and I believe it to be the best GUI-type IMAP client around. It too does the header caching and other stuff mentioned but, compared with Thunderbird, it has: . always performed "better" (i.e., faster) . never crashed (AFAICR) Bling-wise, it's a bit poor, but it gets the job done. Mário Barbosa