On 2/5/2009, Jehan Pagès (jehan.marmott...@gmail.com) wrote: > That's unfortunate, but I cannot do what you say for these reasons. This is > somehow a question of network neutrality ( > http://dig.csail.mit.edu/breadcrumbs/node/144 ).
Not sure what net neutrality has to do with this... unless you are syaing you are operating an ISP service? > But don't make me tell what I don't: I would love to be able to block > spam and if a secure antispam system appears, then I would use it. I > don't argue that spam is potentially interesting and that we should > allow it for people loving it (who?!) of course; the neutrality is > only lost when the antispam fails and caught non-spam as well, > because it is then a regulation system which controls people's > personal data and would improve net experience of many at the price > of data loss for others. Even for ISPs, there are a number of ways to dramatically reduce spam with pretty much zero false positives... ASSP (and now ASSPS) is a great tool... http://apps.sourceforge.net/mediawiki/assp/ Forwarding OBVIOUS spam is simply passing on what should be your problem to others. -- Best regards, Charles