On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 15:43 -0700, Michael M. Slusarz wrote: > From RFC 5530[3]: > > NONEXISTENT > > The operation attempts to delete something that does not exist. > > NONEXISTENT should be used for RENAME or DELETE (also the UID EXPUNGE) > commands.
Well, that sucks.. I'll ask Arnt if he had an actual reason for the above text, but I suppose I'll anyway have to modify Dovecot to internally separate between NONEXISTENT and NONEXISTENT_DELETE or something.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
