Thomas Harold wrote: > On 11/20/2009 1:51 PM, Thomas Berezansky wrote: >> Personally, I am using Horde (http://www.horde.org/) at work (this >> address) and Outlook 2007 at home (largely due to getting freaky >> attachments I need to open on a regular basis that only Microsoft mail >> clients seem to be able to open properly). > > Out of morbid curiosity... how good is Outlook 2007 at IMAP? I've had > experience with Outlook 2003 and the 2GB PST limit was a deal breaker > for me. I'm curious whether Outlook is getting better or worse at IMAP.
They finally added the ability to set a "sent items" folder on the IMAP server rather than using stupid tricks to copy it over, so that's a plus. The fact that it can't "delete" by moving a copy to a "deleted items" folder still bugs me enough that I won't use it. No idea about the PST size thing though, never got that far. ~Seth