v2.0 is still in beta. I should release second beta sometimes soon, but I'm a bit too busy / internetless currently. I'm anyway using the latest hg for my own mails, so it's not completely broken, but I wouldn't necessarily recomment it for larger installations..
On 11.1.2010, at 16.45, Alexander Chekalin wrote: > I'd love to use it (it's going to be magic solution for me). > > But no I haven't looked at v2 yet. Is dsync is ready to use now or this is > just an alpha/beta concept code? > > 11.01.2010 16:34, Timo Sirainen пишет: >> On 11.1.2010, at 16.06, Alexander Chekalin wrote: >> >>> Doing this using imapsync won't work. It is slow (hours vs minutes with >>> rsync) so I can't run it every 5 minutes, and, moreover, it crashes on some >>> messages, so can not rely on it in production. >> >> With v2.0 dsync would be great for this.. >> >
