On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 04:40:35PM +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote: Hello Timo,
> > doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration file > > /usr/local/dovecot-1.2.12/etc/dovecot.conf line 176: Unknown setting: > > process_limit > > This was caused by the old settings translator. What was in line 176? login_max_processes_count = 1024 > Did you have managesieve installed for v1.2? No. > imap process_limit + pop3 process_limit + whatever other protocols you > have enabled and + their process_limit. Ok. Can you explain what are : #default_process_limit = 100 -> which processes ? #default_client_limit = 1000 -> 1 client == 1 remote ip ? #default_vsz_limit = 256M -> ? > > Is there anything to know about this new syntax other than files are > > introduced by "<" ? > > Nope. Well, if you don't want to use files, you can also do: No,no. I just thought it may have something to do with the mode the file would be/should be opened. > > . why is this default not in 10-auth.conf file ? > > You mean why isn't there an example remote {} block there? No. I mean, why isn't the 'disable_plaintext_auth' directive not in the auth.conf file, since it's an auth related directive ? > > . would I have been allowed to do, for instance, in that file at the same > > line > > > > protocol imap { > > remote <internal network address> { > > disable_plaintext_auth = no > > } > > > > ? > > Yes. But didn't you just say that "Currently auth settings don't support local/remote blocks" ? > > Finally, would it make sense to declare other auth listeners than the two > > listed by default in the 10-master.conf file ? > > The defaults also have one example auth(-client) socket commented out > for Postfix. You can create more of them if you want, but unless > something actually uses them they're a bit pointless. Ok, maybe I meant "the auth-userdb" unix listener is mandatory" : is it ? Thanks. -- Thomas Hummel | Institut Pasteur <hum...@pasteur.fr> | Pôle informatique - systèmes et réseau