On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 17:33 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > And thanks for not (yet) making it reject the invalid command with the > 1:* in it
I changed it in v2.0. > -- I'll need to come up with a strategy for migrating to the > 'correct' command on the client side, given that older versions of > dovecot won't accept it. > > I'll probably make the Evolution client code start off by trying the > correct command, and then retry with the bogus '1:*' if that fails. Can't you simply send 1:<last uid you've seen>? Or if you want flags for messages you haven't even seen yet, 1:4294967295 should work too.