hi folks and guys
I described in my blog (http://fakessh.eu/?p=150 http://fakessh.eu/?p=202 )the procedure for migrating from dovecot 1.2.11 to 2.0.0 there is the output of the 2 dovecot-n I used rpm to update Le mardi 05 octobre 2010 à 09:56 +0100, arif khwaja a écrit : > Dear All, > Is there any easy way to upgrade Dovecot like yum command? Or I have to > delete the current and install the new version then change the setting?> > > I will appreciate if you can tell me the steps please? > > Best Regards > Arif > > --- On Fri, 1/10/10, dovecot-requ...@dovecot.org > <dovecot-requ...@dovecot.org> wrote: > > From: dovecot-requ...@dovecot.org <dovecot-requ...@dovecot.org> > Subject: dovecot Digest, Vol 90, Issue 3 > To: dovecot@dovecot.org > Date: Friday, 1 October, 2010, 15:25 > > Send dovecot mailing list submissions to > dovecot@dovecot.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://dovecot.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dovecot > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > dovecot-requ...@dovecot.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > dovecot-ow...@dovecot.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of dovecot digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Dovecot v0.99.13-3 upgrade to 1.0.15-2 ?? (Noel Butler) > 2. Re: how to upgrade dovecot (Noel Butler) > 3. Re: Dovecot v0.99.13-3 upgrade to 1.0.15-2 ?? (Jerry) > 4. Re: Dovecot v0.99.13-3 upgrade to 1.0.15-2 ?? (Jerry) > 5. Re: how to upgrade dovecot (fakessh) > 6. Re: Dovecot v0.99.13-3 upgrade to 1.0.15-2 ?? (Stan Hoeppner) > 7. v1 ok, v2 not (Alberto) > 8. Re: Possible bug with proxy in 2.0.4 (Ed W) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 22:37:25 +1000 > From: Noel Butler <noel.but...@ausics.net> > Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot v0.99.13-3 upgrade to 1.0.15-2 ?? > To: dovecot@dovecot.org > Message-ID: <1285936645.21841.19.ca...@tardis> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 14:20 +0200, Jakob Curdes wrote: > > > > All true, but there is a current 1.2.14 out there which should probably > > be preferred ove a two-and-a-half year old 1.0.15. > > Jakob > > > > Indeed, but some people who use certain distros are scared shitless of > using source packages and will insist on using a several yo version > because thats all <insert distro X or Y here> provides, the 1.2 branch > is rock solid stable and time proven, if distro X/Y only oifferes 1.0.x, > well, that says a lot about distro X/Y, we all know who X 'n Y are, > without mentioning names :) > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: face-smile.png > Type: image/png > Size: 873 bytes > Desc: not available > Url : > http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20101001/d1d05ea2/attachment-0001.png > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 22:40:41 +1000 > From: Noel Butler <noel.but...@ausics.net> > Subject: Re: [Dovecot] how to upgrade dovecot > To: dovecot@dovecot.org > Message-ID: <1285936841.21841.23.ca...@tardis> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 13:32 +0100, arif khwaja wrote: > > > Dear All, > > I have Centos 5 and devecot 1.0.7 I want to upgrade it to the latest > > version. I will appreciate if any one can tell me how can I upgrade it > > please. > > > > > > > use the source, luke :) from the website > > I suggest using 1.2.14, expect a couple teething problems depending on your > setup for the 1.0 to 1.2 > changes in the config, but as to how you need it built, depends on how you > are using it now. > > . > > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: face-smile.png > Type: image/png > Size: 873 bytes > Desc: not available > Url : > http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20101001/19bf35d4/attachment-0001.png > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 08:53:58 -0400 > From: Jerry <dovecot.u...@seibercom.net> > Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot v0.99.13-3 upgrade to 1.0.15-2 ?? > To: dovecot@dovecot.org > Message-ID: <20101001085358.6c8c3...@scorpio> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 22:32:39 +1000 > Noel Butler <noel.but...@ausics.net> articulated: > > > really? wow how things must have changed in recent years, they used to > > be so, well, debian like, but not quite as bad :) > > Touch?. The FreeBSD developers do have a bug up their ass regarding GPL > licenses which has effectively slowed down the introduction of some new > (better) software into the base system. This has reportedly led to > sporadic problems with some newer applications being released into the > FreeBSD ports system. > > All things considered though, they usually maintain software that is > relatively up-to-date; i.e., Postfix for example. The developers version > is always available and current in the ports system. Most other major > applications follow that general protocol. New releases of Dovecot are > always available, usually only a few days after being released. This > 2.x version is not the norm though. It is, as you so clearly stated, a > BETA version. I would like to see FreeBSED release it clearly marked as > a BETA or DEVELOPERS version, aka "USE AT ON RISK". Doing so would > allow it to receive more extensive testing while warning potential > users of the risks involved. > > I would comment on Debian; however, I don't want to start a flame war. > > -- > Jerry ? > dovecot.u...@seibercom.net > > Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. > Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. > __________________________________________________________________ > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 08:59:03 -0400 > From: Jerry <dovecot.u...@seibercom.net> > Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot v0.99.13-3 upgrade to 1.0.15-2 ?? > To: dovecot@dovecot.org > Message-ID: <20101001085903.71a54...@scorpio> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 22:37:25 +1000 > Noel Butler <noel.but...@ausics.net> articulated: > > > Indeed, but some people who use certain distros are scared shitless of > > using source packages and will insist on using a several yo version > > because thats all <insert distro X or Y here> provides, the 1.2 > > branch is rock solid stable and time proven, if distro X/Y only > > oifferes 1.0.x, well, that says a lot about distro X/Y, we all know > > who X 'n Y are, without mentioning names :) > > Seriously, the weekend is upon use. Nothing like a good flame war over > whose OS is superior. > > -- > Jerry ? > dovecot.u...@seibercom.net > > Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. > Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. > __________________________________________________________________ > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 15:11:02 +0200 > From: fakessh <fake...@fakessh.eu> > Subject: Re: [Dovecot] how to upgrade dovecot > To: Dovecot Mailing List <dovecot@dovecot.org> > Message-ID: <201010011511.08456.fake...@fakessh.eu> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Le vendredi 1 octobre 2010 14:40, Noel Butler a ?crit?: > > On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 13:32 +0100, arif khwaja wrote: > > > Dear All, > > > I have Centos 5 and devecot 1.0.7 I want to upgrade it to the latest > > > version. I will appreciate if any one can tell me how can I upgrade it > > > please. > > > > use the source, luke :) from the website > > > > I suggest using 1.2.14, expect a couple teething problems depending on your > > setup for the 1.0 to 1.2 changes in the config, but as to how you need it > > built, depends on how you are using it now. > > > > . > I describe the procedure for migrating from 1.2.13 to 2.0.0 on my blog > i quote dovecot -n for 1.2.11 and i quote dovecot -n for 2.0.0 > http://fakessh.eu/?p=150 > http://fakessh.eu/ > sign my blog if you desire > -- > http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x092164A7 > > gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 092164A7 > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: not available > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 189 bytes > Desc: not available > Url : > http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20101001/8ab7ec2c/attachment-0001.bin > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 08:35:54 -0500 > From: Stan Hoeppner <s...@hardwarefreak.com> > Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot v0.99.13-3 upgrade to 1.0.15-2 ?? > To: dovecot@dovecot.org > Message-ID: <4ca5e3ba.5050...@hardwarefreak.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Jerry put forth on 10/1/2010 7:59 AM: > > On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 22:37:25 +1000 > > Noel Butler <noel.but...@ausics.net> articulated: > > > >> Indeed, but some people who use certain distros are scared shitless of > >> using source packages and will insist on using a several yo version > >> because thats all <insert distro X or Y here> provides, the 1.2 > >> branch is rock solid stable and time proven, if distro X/Y only > >> oifferes 1.0.x, well, that says a lot about distro X/Y, we all know > >> who X 'n Y are, without mentioning names :) > > > > Seriously, the weekend is upon use. Nothing like a good flame war over > > whose OS is superior. > > I've never understood the OS flame war mentality. Each OS has its > strengths and its weaknesses. You pick your OS poison based on the > strengths you desire, and live with the warts. Every OS has warts, some > more than others, but they all have 'em. > > -- > Stan > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 16:09:35 +0200 > From: Alberto <alberto....@gmail.com> > Subject: [Dovecot] v1 ok, v2 not > To: dovecot@dovecot.org > Message-ID: > <aanlktim0mxqoyicsbuxgtrcnbndpwxgppc5nwfoon...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > hello everybody! > > This's my very first post in dovecot. I'm installing a new server for backup > site, with qmail + vpopmail 5.4.32 + dovecot. > Production server, more or less outdated, runs with Couier Imap, but > everybody know the history.. > I've been fighting for several days...And no luck with version 2.0.4, 2.0.3 > neither. > My first asumption was to review things thousand of times due to newbie > condition... > This morning I've tried version 1.2.14 and voila! , it works perfectly! > > The error log with version 2 was the famous unkown user one: > > dovecot: auth: vpopmail(te...@adomain.com,10.206.16.10): unknown user > > test4 user worked perfectly with pop3... > > Just FYI, is this can help. > > Regards! > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 15:25:22 +0100 > From: Ed W <li...@wildgooses.com> > Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Possible bug with proxy in 2.0.4 > To: Timo Sirainen <t...@iki.fi> > Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org > Message-ID: <4ca5ef52.5040...@wildgooses.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > On 30/09/2010 18:48, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 08:08 +0100, Ed W wrote: > >>> CRAM-MD5 doesn't work directly with proxying. It can't work, by CRAM-MD5 > >>> design. The only way to make it work is if your passdb lookup returns a > >>> password, either the user's actual password in plaintext or some master > >>> password, that the backends accepts with plaintext authentication. > >> I'm not quite sure I understand the nuances of that? > >> > >> Yes I do have a passdb (on the remote machine) which returns a plain > >> password. Actually since it's DB driven I have already returned all the > >> information needed to auth the user on the proxying machine > >> > >> The password query is the same on both sides and it looks like: > >> > >> password_query = SELECT NULLIF(mail_host, '%l') as proxy, > >> NULLIF(mail_host, '%l') as host, \ > >> email as user, password, \ > > Add: ..., password, password as pass, .. > > > > > > Aha - this is the master login stuff. That does kind of make sense. > Quite subtle mind > > Thanks for replying > > Ed W > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > dovecot mailing list > dovecot@dovecot.org > http://dovecot.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dovecot > > End of dovecot Digest, Vol 90, Issue 3 > ************************************** > > > > -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x092164A7 gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 092164A7
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée