On 2011-03-08 12:42 PM, Thierry de Montaudry wrote: > On 08 Mar 2011, at 19:37, Charles Marcus wrote: >> So... if the httpd process is the one consuming all of the CPU, doesn't >> it stand to reason that it might be something to do with one of your web >> apps, and not dovecot?
> But then why was it fine with 1.1.13, which never had once this > problem in 2 years? or is 2.0.9 slower, or consuming more resources > to create the problem? You don't see how it might be possible that 2.0.x does something that 1.1.x didn't do that your webmail app might not like, without it being a dovecot bug? I'm not saying it is or it isn't, but I'd look there first - see if an update is available for your webmail app... since you were running an ancient version of dovecot, maybe you're also running an ancient version of it too? -- Best regards, Charles