On 2012-01-25 8:34 AM, Jean-Daniel Beaubien <jd.beaub...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Timo Sirainen<t...@iki.fi> wrote:
Dovecot should already have such cache. If there are problems with that, I
think it would be better to fix it on Dovecot's side rather than adding a
second cache.
Very true. Has there been many search/index improvements since 1.0.9? I
read thru the release notes but nothing jumped out at me.
Seriously??
1.0.9 is *very* old, and even no longer really supported.
Upgrade. Really. It isn't that hard. There is zero reason to stay on an
unsupported version.
I am doing this because I am having issue with multiple people searching
thru email folders that have 100k+ emails (which is another problem in
itself, searches don't seem to scale well when folder goes above 60k
emails).
Maybe enable fts-solr or fts-lucene? (Both work much better in v2.1.)
I was under the impression that lucene was for full-text search. I'm just
doing simple from/to field searches.
I will get a few numbers together about folder_size --> search time and I
will post them tonight.
Don't waste your time testing such an old and unsupported version, I'm
sure Timo has no interest in any such numbers - *unless* you are
planning on doing said tests on *both* the 1.0.9 version *and* the
latest 2.0.x or 2.1 build and provide a *comparison* - *that* may be
interesting...
--
Best regards,
Charles
