Quoting Timo Sirainen <t...@iki.fi>:
On 14.2.2012, at 5.19, Michael M Slusarz wrote:
b login (SAVEDSTATE 1234567890) user pass
I guess the drawback for this approach is that you are explicitly
breaking the LOGIN definition.
No breaking, extending :)
Heh. I should know better after reading about 1000 RFCs last year...
Anyway, to play devil's advocate, another drawback of this approach is
that in the (fairly remote) chance that the LOGIN command is extended
in the future by an RFC, there is no guarantee that this syntax would
be used.
michael
