Hi -- On 04.03.2012, at 12:05, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 3.3.2012, at 20.03, Michael Grimm wrote:
>> vmail> dsync -v -f -u test mirror ssh vm...@remote-host.tld dsync -v -f >> -u test >> dsync-local(test): Error: remote: dsync: illegal option -- f >> doveadm dsync-server [-u <user>|-A] [-S <socket_path>] >> dsync-local(test): Error: read() from worker server failed: EOF >> >> If I do omit the remote '-f' the old syntax is being accepted. Thanks for >> fixing that. > > Right, the remote -f parameter doesn't do anything. But it's anyway now > allowed: > http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/9c6eeeb810c0 Ok, that means it has always been ignored in 2.0.x ;-) >>> doveadm sync -f -u test t...@remote-host.tld >> >> vmail> doveadm sync -f -u test ssh vm...@remote-host.tld >> dsync-local(test): Error: remote: dsync-server: Command not found. >> dsync-local(test): Error: read() from worker server failed: EOF > > Remove the "ssh" parameter from the middle and change vmail@ to test@ That doesn't work in my ssh setup, because I'm using a different ssh port and thus have to run: ssh -p 1234 vm...@remote-host.tld Sorry, I should have mentioned that before. In your other mail about 'dsync replication' you refer to a config option: #dsync_remote_cmd = ssh -l%{login} %{host} doveadm dsync-server -u%u -l%{lock_timeout} -n%{namespace} Would that allow for ssh options to be set? >> Users are virtual ones at both mail servers, and vmail is the only system >> user to run ssh. >> Thus I can't test user suggestion. But it's ok to add a 'doveadm >> dsync-server -u test'. > > In this syntax the test@ means Dovecot user, not system user. Although I'm > not sure if that's > a good idea. In the latest hg version the preferred way is: > > doveadm sync -f -u test remote:vmail@host See above regarding ssh options. >> Now, I will stick to 2.1.x because syncing is done without loss of mails >> (after 10 days of testing). >> The only inconvenience remaining is reappearing of deleted and "undeletable" >> mail. But it seems that >> I'm the only one reporting that. How could I help to debug this issue? > > Is anything else besides Dovecot modifying the mailboxes? Especially deleting > mails? No cronjobs or > other scripts that "rm" mails? No. Only dovecot is allowed to deliver mail (lmtp). Sieve's 'copy:' and 'fileinto' are used as well. But no scripts or such are used to remove mail. I'm running mdbox only. Thanks and regards, Michael
