On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 3:16 AM, Willie Gillespie <wgillespie+dove...@es2eng.com> wrote: > On 4/6/2012 3:52 AM, Thomas von Eyben wrote: >> >> Test results: >> CLIENT-1 is having the problems when CLIENT-2 is using all the >> (100Mbps) bandwidth eg. copying files to MAIL-SRV. >> If I move CLIENT-1 to CLIENT-3 then almost all the delay is gone. >> NB.: I have not (yet) tested if the problem also exists when CLIENT-2 >> generates traffic to MAIL-SRV as opposed to OTHER-SRV (but I am >> expecting the same problems). > > > So the link between your 100 Mbps switch and the 1 Gbps switch is saturated > by CLIENT-2, so CLIENT-1 is just getting the leftovers? > > Since CLIENT-3 doesn't go through that 100 Mbps switch, it obviously doesn't > see that issue.
Yes - that's my current "workaround" (perhaps also solution), I'm wondering if the performance is really expected to be _so_ bad when other users are utilizing the LAN. (You seem to indicate that what I am observing is expected and is "just" caused by [un-intended] semi-bad behavior from other users…) BR TvE