;-) Ok, next one: TRAC ?
--- Martin Rabl Am 11.04.2012 um 08:46 schrieb Timo Sirainen <t...@iki.fi>: > Probably the ugliest/user-unfriendliest bug tracker UI that I've ever seen :) > > On 11.4.2012, at 9.43, Martin Rabl wrote: > >> What about Mantis? >> >> >> --- >> Martin Rabl >> >> Am 11.04.2012 um 08:26 schrieb Timo Sirainen <t...@iki.fi>: >> >>> I started thinking that perhaps I should move my TODO list to a bug >>> tracker. But because of reasons I've explained a few times before, I don't >>> want a full blown public bug tracking system. The requirements for it are: >>> >>> * I am the only person who can add new bugs. Everyone else reports >>> bugs/requests to this mailing list as before. (Well, I guess Stephan could >>> use this as well if he wants to.) >>> >>> * Everyone can comment existing bugs. >>> >>> * Dovecot mailing list integration: Commenting a bug sends a mail to the >>> mailing list. Replies to those comments go back to bug tracker (probably >>> based on some [#1234] tag in subject). I would have the option of adding a >>> comment that doesn't go to the mailing list (= adding some internal comment >>> that nobody else cares about). Notifications about new bugs won't go to the >>> mailing list (most likely it was created due to a recent mailing list post). >>> >>> So the main difference to how things work now is that people would be able >>> to easily browse existing bugs and add comments to them. I would add bugs >>> there only when I'm not planning on fixing them within a few days. I >>> wouldn't add each and every feature request there, only the things that I'm >>> actually interested in developing. So the idea would be to actually get the >>> bug tracker emptied at some point, not to be a graveyard of unimportant >>> feature requests that about 1-2 people in the world would want. >>> >>> So, any suggestions for what software could do these things? I think >>> Request Tracker has those features, but it's not really the >>> nicest/prettiest thing. >>> >> >
