On 4/13/2012 10:31 AM, Ed W wrote: > You mean those "answers" like:
> "you need to read 'those' articles again" > > Referring to some unknown and hard to find previous emails is not the > same as answering? No, referring to this: On 4/12/2012 5:58 AM, Ed W wrote: > The claim by ZFS/BTRFS authors and others is that data silently "bit > rots" on it's own. Is it not a correct assumption that you read this in articles? If you read this in books, scrolls, or chiseled tablets, my apologies for assuming it was articles. -- Stan