thank you very much for help! On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 18.6.2012, at 20.23, Wojciech Puchar wrote:Anyway, fts-lucene backend works better than fts-squat.Better in what respect? less than a second (when disk I/O was needed) fulltext search over 10000 mails doesn't look bad :)Squat index updates are somewhat slow, especially if the index is large.
