On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 19:54 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 25.6.2012, at 19.49, Charles Marcus wrote: > > I'd suggest you try again with 2.1.7... > > The rewritten dsync is in v2.2 tree. v2.1's dsync is a fixed version > of v2.0's dsync. I have no idea why v2.1's dsync would be less > reliable than v2.0's. It only had bugfixes. > > Anyway, the GUID error could very well be because of buggy mailbox > listing code in v2.0, which was rewritten for v2.1.
I will try the latest 2.1.x code and see what happens. dsync in 2.0.x seems to work just fine... most of the time. ...Jeff