As per this discussion almost a year ago, was there any attempt to introduce failover mode planned Timo?
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 13:26 -0700, Paul B. Henson wrote: > > Perhaps it could be an option, either load balancing between all > available servers, or only using later listed servers when the earlier > listed ones are failing. For my purposes, either way is fine, as long as > authentications don't fail :). The other contributor to this thread, who > has a local mysql replica listed first and the central master listed > second probably wouldn't want the load balanced between them.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
