Am 12.11.2012 02:11, schrieb Daniel L. Miller: > On 11/6/2012 12:30 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> On 6.11.2012, at 17.26, Ed W wrote: >> >>> On 05/11/2012 23:22, Timo Sirainen wrote: >>>> On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 23:40 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: >>>> This also provides a nice abstraction to OpenSSL, making it again possible >>>> to implement other backends like >>>> GnuTLS or NSS. (Except login process code doesn't use lib-ssl-iostream >>>> yet.) >>> Does libtomcrypt implement enough? >> It doesn't do SSL, which is all Dovecot cares about. >> > > Can the GnuTLS OpenSSL compatibility layer be used safely?
where is the problem with openssl? please leave us in peace with gnuTLS and see how it affects OpenVAS / Greenbone Sceurity Assistant on distributions like Fedora the whole year what about config compatibility like ssl_cipher_list = ALL:!LOW:!MEDIUM:!SSLv2:!MD5:!aNULL:!eNUL:!ADH:!AESGCM:!EXP:HIGH
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
