Here are the non-verbose mode of the logs exhibiting the problem: /// Mar 15 06:56:37 andromeda dovecot: lda(cryptodan): Fatal: setgid(8(mail) from mail_gid setting) failed with euid=1000(cryptodan), gid=1000(cryptodan), egid=1000(cryptodan): Operation not permitted (This binary should probably be called with process group set to 8(mail) instead of 1000(cryptodan))
Mar 15 06:56:38 andromeda dovecot: lda(cryptodan): Fatal: setgid(8(mail) from mail_gid setting) failed with euid=1000(cryptodan), gid=1000(cryptodan), egid=1000(cryptodan): Operation not permitted (This binary should probably be called with process group set to 8(mail) instead of 1000(cryptodan)) Mar 15 06:56:38 andromeda postfix/local[5433]: E6DD110007E: to=< crypto...@cryptodan.net>, relay=local, delay=0.11, delays=0.07/0/0/0.04, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (temporary failure) Mar 15 06:56:38 andromeda dovecot: lda(cryptodan): Fatal: setgid(8(mail) from mail_gid setting) failed with euid=1000(cryptodan), gid=1000(cryptodan), egid=1000(cryptodan): Operation not permitted (This binary should probably be called with process group set to 8(mail) instead of 1000(cryptodan)) Mar 15 06:56:38 andromeda postfix/local[5439]: 20BB2100076: to=< crypto...@cryptodan.net>, relay=local, delay=879, delays=879/0.01/0/0.03, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (temporary failure) Mar 15 06:59:56 andromeda postfix/anvil[5420]: statistics: max connection rate 1/60s for (smtp:209.85.212.41) at Mar 15 10:56:35 Mar 15 06:59:56 andromeda postfix/anvil[5420]: statistics: max connection count 1 for (smtp:209.85.212.41) at Mar 15 10:56:35 Mar 15 06:59:56 andromeda postfix/anvil[5420]: statistics: max cache size 1 at Mar 15 10:56:35 /// I did not remove anything, just separated the log entries to make them more readable. dovecot unix - n n - - pipe flags=DRhu user=vmail:mail argv=/usr/lib/dovecot/dovecot-lda -d $(recipient) On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Charles Marcus <cmar...@media-brokers.com>wrote: > On 2013-03-14 6:41 PM, Daniel Reinhardt <crypto...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Here is the output of the postconf -n. I aplogize for the postconf -d, as >> I was not aware of the difference. >> > > No problem... but you forgot the other most important thing... > > NON-VERBOSE postfix logs exhibiting the problem... > > -- > > Best regards, > > Charles > > > -- Daniel Reinhardt crypto...@cryptodan.net http://www.cryptodan.net 301-875-7018(c) 410-455-0488(h)