-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, Dave Gattis wrote:
Our emails are redirected from the home office causing all vacation responses
to fail with, "discarding vacation response for implicitly delivered message;
no known (envelope) recipient address found in message headers".
=== headers from reply
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
X-Original-To: [email protected]
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from spamcop.main.ch (spamcop.main.ch [83.144.241.40])
by domain-b.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E4E81C101DE
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 14:35:13 -0400
(EDT)
Received: from ex.domain-a.com (ex.domain-a.com [83.144.240.35]) by
spamcop.main.ch with ESMTP id 0dP4XCjZrdDY5l1Q for
<[email protected]>; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 19:41:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: from EX2.domain-a.com ([fe80::acd3:8e53:bcb6:7a4%11]) by
ex2.domain-a.com ([fe80::acd3:8e53:bcb6:7a4%11]) with Microsoft SMTP
Server
id
14.01.0355.002; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 19:39:54 +0100
From: Dave Gattis <[email protected]>
To: SUMACO Gattis Dave <[email protected]>
=====
You have two problems:
a) "no known (envelope) recipient address found in message headers" means,
that the vacation :addresses list does not contain
[email protected]
because vacation probes the entries of the :addresses list against To and
CC.
b) the messages are _resend_ not forwarded by spamcop.main.ch to your MTA.
By doing so the original *envelope* sender address is lost, which is *not*
the entry in "From:". Therefore vacation would send the reply to:
[email protected]
which is the return path per your excerpt. You could verify that by
finding the envelope sender in the postfix logs, I guess; or by fixing a).
Actually, I'm not sure if pigeonhole can pick up the address to reply to
from a mail header - I do not see any hints in the sample config. So,
maybe, you need to ask spamcop.main.ch to preserve the return address.
Note: Changing the envelope sender is not bad by itself, it solves several
problems with forwarding; a well-known MTA can do this, too:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/exchange2010/thread/8006eabb-3334-4ff1-89d6-d647088bec46
, but you get other problems rewriting the sender address.
- --
Steffen Kaiser
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUBUVLAH13r2wJMiz2NAQJYbgf+OdgAU/KJiMANoUJ6XDiwPuNGr0IMNCev
QOBtc+EgDTJ36yBAbtOn88zhHCgXuBwLxQax5cx3E5eQ0mba6IxJm7c9whaJA+IG
y0Eh8bJiIfAKtGrEWoz6riktDkJ89kLpxY0zycpPgK6xGUiBvSHFb59bpIMc+WLX
YHXWzX8u3216Jydr28x+Gcday/mix6zujoQucRjzPmAXc9RjFqkLxiOuIdDP+zSH
war8t7QWlEVtfgCOG07V0QkqEvM047HhRbSZuTRcTHmUH2Sjfwe3fdHdnmjd4wvk
wsVl9F/X7cdzh84uQ2eP2ZIfQYuC4vu/Ur1ONyaxH4DBxFyIdFjngA==
=stJs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
