Timo Sirainen <t...@iki.fi> wrote:

> On 7.4.2013, at 20.58, Andreas Meyer <anme...@anup.de> wrote:
> 
> >>> Apr  7 15:52:51 delta postfix/smtpd[19988]: warning: access table 
> >>> inet:127.0.0.1:12340 entry  has empty value
> >> 
> >> I wonder if that really means that it's getting an empty value or if it's 
> >> something else. I don't know why it would be getting an empty value. Do 
> >> you see an anything in Dovecot's error log?
> > 
> > Apr  7 19:55:53 delta postfix/smtpd[23362]: connect from 
> > dovecot.org[193.210.130.67]
> > Apr  7 19:55:53 delta postfix/smtpd[23362]: warning: access table 
> > inet:127.0.0.1:12340 entry  has empty value
> 
> 
> Oh, notice the two spaces there between "entry  has"? It's looking up an 
> empty key (instead of email@address), so it's getting back an empty value. 
> Although Dovecot's reply should still be DUNNO then. Anyway, looks to me like 
> Postfix config isn't correct somehow.
> 

Yes I saw the space between "entry  has". ;). And yes, like posted in my
other email, I set the check for the inet_listener to the beginning of
the recipient_restrictions in Postfix and the thing worked and the MTA
refused to take the mail over.

But thereby got the problem not beeing able to send any email to the
mailserver. Don't know why at the moment. Something is wrong with the
order of the checks in postfix.

  Andreas

Reply via email to