Timo Sirainen <t...@iki.fi> wrote: > By this I think you don't mean special authentication mechanisms, or even > AUTHENTICATE PLAIN mechanism, but you mean that someone is using LOGIN > command in such a kludgy way that the password field is over 1024 > bytes long?
This is for pam_saml. The webmail sends a signed SAML assertion as the password, and the PAM module validates it. You did support in in 1.x and it did not harm anyone... -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz m...@netbsd.org
