On 30.4.2013, at 2.25, Mike Abbott <michael.abb...@apple.com> wrote: > In dovecot-2.2.1 neither the SELECT nor the EXAMINE commands include an > untagged URLMECH reply. (Note, this is not the one mandated by the RESETKEY > command.) > > AFAICT RFC 4467 does not require an URLMECH reply to SELECT or EXAMINE but > without it clients have no way of knowing about authorization mechanisms > other than INTERNAL. Now I know dovecot-2.2 supports only the INTERNAL > mechanism at present so this is probably harmless, but still I think it's > worthwhile to ask: Is the absence of the URLMECH reply intentional or an > oversight?
I think I'll leave it out unless some day another mechanism is added: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lemonade/current/msg05127.html
