El 07/05/13 02:19, Tim Groeneveld escribió:


----- Original Message -----
On 2013-04-30 8:00 PM, Tim Groeneveld <t...@timgws.com.au> wrote:
After thinking about it a little bit more, I have determined
that just recombining the messages to send them to the client
will be too intensive, and will cause extra latencies when
retrieving emails.

Scratching my head trying to figure out what you mean here... ?

What do you mean by 'recombining the messages'?

I was thinking of splitting all of the mime parts and recombining
them later when the message was requested.

All of the parts would be hashed and stored separate to the
message. This would mean things like image signatures and the
like would only be stored once.

 From what I understand, SIS does not do this. (that being said,
I have not looked too deeply into SIS at the moment, as I am
currently working on the elasticsearch FTS plugin)

I think that SiS DOES exactly this. All attachments are splited from the original message and stored in a common attachments directory. When the message is requested, then parts are recombined.

--
Angel L. Mateo Martínez
Sección de Telemática
Área de Tecnologías de la Información
y las Comunicaciones Aplicadas (ATICA)
http://www.um.es/atica
Tfo: 868889150
Fax: 868888337

Reply via email to