-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 26 Jul 2013, Martin Burgraf wrote:

I'm using Dovecot together with Postfix; as I understand it, there are two ways 
to transfer the mail from Postfix to Dovecot.
1.) by using LDA with mailbox_command = /usr/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda -f "$SENDER" -a 
"$RECIPIENT"
2.) by using LMTP with mailbox_transport = lmtp:unix:private/dovecot-lmtp

(currently using number 1)
I'm interessted in the differences and the advantages/disadvantages of each of 
those solutions.

According to http://wiki2.dovecot.org/LDA the recommended way is to use LMTP, 
since it's supposed to have a better performance.
On the other hand, http://wiki2.dovecot.org/LMTP says, that LMTP is a backgound 
process, while LDA is only called when needed. I've also read, that LDA only 
uses the users privileges, which both means, that LDA should be better.
I've also noticed, that LMTP adds an additional Recieved:-Header to the mail.
Are there any other differences?

LMTP also adds "Delivered-To", unless I'm mistaken.

There is one difference, that pops up on failure: The LDA has the exit code only to return success/failure back to the MTA. LMTP uses the same mechanisms as SMTP to return success / failure incl. descriptive information.

There is another difference, if you need additional hacking: With the LDA-method you can put a wrapper script between MTA and MDA, in order to alter the message, recipient, just log something, ... . Actually that self-made wrapper script [and I really mean script in the sense of bash, perl, python, C, ruby, ...] can control the delivery fully. That would be more sophisticated to do with LMTP.

- -- Steffen Kaiser
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUBUfYVuF3r2wJMiz2NAQLWwgf8CNZ+J9UmFco1dftatU95/MKN1T+70PuL
w3+PpCbhCfJ3SHlnlTjRydaAYue4tL0Mu6lJ2ajm3n0SJSHukdxaWmPy6/P0dufV
EQePTE3W0UD2j+zNYn57LCfF81No9c86A3Uz7DQcPhmsvCSZTo3PyEaPz0PkflTR
BNQ14juGmJAQxSJDvudgCgzx7TnnGoqEx8EsKMTjSA0W3gCCng6N7MRCHuoCEZBJ
AEfnwNgnw7bpeiPedI4l8gnvYEYK99Xa0ZmzjEYmbitzulTPRu8jPny7dfAHp5Bd
xzEN3qWq/QZZ62wQgYSqYPT8mL8aRcwbS7ur9WbsBZHEmr0lLxnhlQ==
=5twi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to