Am 16.09.2013 11:59, schrieb Steffen Kram: >> i generally do not understand why dovecot insists >> in warning about whatever mountpoints - what is >> the point that dovecot needs to care about anything >> ever mounted on a machine as long it is not referred >> in any configuration > > I absolutely agree. In my opinion it is not the problem of dovecot if my > mount points exists or not. If the only purpose is to track if a user already > existed or if its a new user for whom directories and mailboxes have to be > created. Or are there other use cases I just read > http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Mountpoints. > > As pointed out in > http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2012-January/063419.html there might be > problems for dbox mailboxes, if the indexes are stored on a different mount. > What's the point in doing that? It would be great if there was a way to just > disable the mount point tracking if I don't store indexes on different mounts > and don't use the dsync replication feature, even if it's just a compile time > option.
and in case you are running dovecot only as a proxy it needs not to care about *any* mountpoint at all - consider the mess if every software out there would act this way.....
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature