On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 10:14 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * Thomas Leuxner <t...@leuxner.net>: > > * Ralf Hildebrandt <ralf.hildebra...@charite.de> 2013.11.22 09:44: > > > > > Which patch? > > > > http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-November/093654.html > > > > Pigeonhole related patches. > > Damn. Those are biting me as well :/ >
These would be found if Timo reverted back to issuing RC's before any official release, to iron out the niggly off-putting bugs, like most software does, or gets his devs and a community of official testers each with wildly different configurations and set ups, ASF have an excellent model that could be followed, bunch of devs and testers who each report on different distros and configs, why? because no single dev can imagine and test every possible configuration. it might just save dovecot's good name, I recall a lot of damage was done to that in the circles I'm in when 2.0 was released with patches nearly every few days and weeks, I know a few ISP's and businesses that went back to courier or Wu's because major bugs were getting in often, though it has been a lot better since 2.1 series, until this release that is :)
<<attachment: face-smile.png>>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
