Am 17.05.2014 17:31, schrieb Boris: > Why so aggressive? because there is a documentation and the only correct answer not following that is "you are in the area of undefined bahvior"
> I just noticed that I missed the "<" and wondered whether > if makes a difference because it seems to work without it most likely because some follow up commit to work around woring configurations > I know where to find the documentation but searching for this question > is a bit hard since I can't search for "<". And the wiki doesn't > explain the syntax anyway. that's not a dovecot syntax that's just unix [harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ echo "bla" > test [harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ cat < test bla > After reading the patch am I right in assuming that with "</" the variable in > the dovecot code contains the certificate itself instead of the link to the > file? And if that is correct: Was dovecot reading the file every time it > needed > it before the change? no - < reads a file and without you are supposed to directly paste your certificate in the configuration instead point to a file
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
