-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 08.11.2014 um 19:33 schrieb Reindl Harald:
> looks like TB tries a atomic rename (depending on the server > capabilities) which could do a fallback to copy/rename in case of > a message - doing that for a whole folder i dangerous - in case the > folder may contain 5000 messages > > mayboe you could configure TB trash to a local folder instead keep > it on the server (as long you control all clients) - may also help > against users deleting junk but never empty trash :-) worth a thought, yes ... I will suggest that to the customer next week. Thanks, Stefan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUXmMhAAoJEClcuD1V0Pzm7SQP/2IOyWhA3+rdeWbUqPddE4zH mSOEu5xbsWrSg3M+n+4dqxfpXoxTwGOFXr2GJyP0yZAG33j2W+xt5wSFRwTNdYXz d5GQyCwYPtY+H5ssPsVLqr5rxpKKVAp6SkZBDy4Cqi0bf1zqOxbBXvXGpU5WGO1M FuCJduEW0xa2iQOoJfNlr8kGc6ZwbIK1FluFNCwjDsPLQJ2lLyVTCZMRamF6y6zg chy5lqRIdRuENife/Kd2Yj+P5W75P2mrCSUhwqAyvM1L6Y8aHIxc74DuojOh1UFG 9IS9aQxGJGudvz9IotFylodeIjvexWqIr+24mTWYqsL831YS6PwW2A9x4ZhXejHa yg2VigihvJygG7o3fD0IEHpBBHeHUCgCyGCIzGQhRh0vJ6OSSoBlzq9xPG7Bn+K0 VkkSDKfjBuZRHx4BrtSI/Z9N7HjOxnh1Tg6LYrpJpM2aPtMUpPXe36HDXsT2gbtX ot4NyKNlxjK2KoNmvVgJcsoRjfS3Sz6h8SKVoRX8ukwJ+U/wp1UKTkuT/TSWNEtd fOA3lqMc10r9Lf7dqYFzxZEiLnN9+Z17SGOgepcKu+6MphweLrYiYzzvkx/mA9l8 8p59f2Y3JfimHFrMkp0aYCzQNr1mlzqYrfNO89BgbDgJn4rDxa+nYrEH+uWhc2IT 6Xxr71jt3y67rpV5nwpI =etZg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----