actually . you are, i missed it all the noise horde seems to generate, precedence covers pretty much all of that crap, i was glad I left horde, seems its still as stuffed as ever
On 11/26/14, Nick Edwards <nick.z.edwa...@gmail.com> wrote: > jesus! > learn to use precedence > > > On 11/26/14, Harry Mills <ha...@opendium.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have an issue with a vacation message in a sieve script. I can't see >> an error in the script itself. >> >> Pigeonhole version: 0.4.2-32 >> Dovecot Version: 2.2.10 >> >> The script was created by Ingo (part of the Horde suite), but I think >> the script is fine. The problem is that when a message is sent to the >> "everyone" group (and alias for every person in the organisation), >> vacation messages are being sent back which I believe is an error. >> >> The script is: >> >> >> =============================================== >> # Sieve Filter >> # Generated by Ingo (http://www.horde.org/apps/ingo/) (11/11/14, >> 5:20:06 pm GMT) >> require ["vacation", "regex", "fileinto"]; >> # Vacation >> if allof ( not exists "list-help", not exists "list-unsubscribe", not >> exists "list-subscribe", not exists "list-owner", not exists >> "list-post", not exists "list-archive", not exists "list-id", not exists >> "Mailing-List", not header :comparator "i;ascii-casemap" :is >> "Precedence" ["list", "bulk", "junk"], not header :comparator >> "i;ascii-casemap" :matches "To" "Multiple recipients of*" ) { >> if header :regex "Received" "^.*(2014) (\\(.*\\) )?..:..:.. >> (\\(.*\\) )?((\\+|\\-)[[:digit:]]{4}|.{1,5})( \\(.*\\))?$" { >> if header :regex "Received" "^.*(Nov) (\\(.*\\) )?.... (\\(.*\\) >> )?..:..:.. (\\(.*\\) )?((\\+|\\-)[[:digit:]]{4}|.{1,5})( \\(.*\\))?$" { >> if header :regex "Received" "^.*(13|14|15|16|17|18) (\\(.*\\) )?... >> (\\(.*\\) )?.... (\\(.*\\) )?..:..:.. (\\(.*\\) >> )?((\\+|\\-)[[:digit:]]{4}|.{1,5})( \\(.*\\))?$" { >> vacation :days 7 :addresses "user2" :subject "Out of office" >> "IMPORTANT MESSAGE^M >> THE MESSAGE >> "; >> } >> } >> } >> } >> =============================================== >> >> The user "User2" sent a vacation message back to the sender >> "u...@example.com" in response to this message (headers only): >> >> =============================================== >> Return-path: <u...@example.com> >> Envelope-to: every...@example.com >> Delivery-date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 16:08:16 +0000 >> Received: from tunis.Exampledomain.local ([192.168.254.107] helo=Tunis) >> by mail.example.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) >> (envelope-from <u...@example.com>) >> id 1XowwM-0007Qw-Cj >> for every...@example.com; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 16:08:10 +0000 >> From: "User" <u...@example.com> >> To: "Everyone at Example" <every...@example.com> >> Subject: Electrician >> Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 16:08:10 -0000 >> Organization: Example Consultancy >> Message-ID: <02e601cfff5c$051ec350$0f5c49f0$@example.com> >> MIME-Version: 1.0 >> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; >> boundary="----=_NextPart_000_02E7_01CFFF5C.051FD4C0" >> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 >> Thread-Index: Ac//W17ujWbs6KgRRsOZFc7+qT45Tg== >> Content-Language: en-gb >> X-Spam-Note: SpamAssassin run bypassed - sent from local address >> >> This is a multipart message in MIME format. >> >> =============================================== >> >> I have checked RFC 5230 section 4.5 which states: >> >> "Vacation" MUST NOT respond to a message unless the recipient user's >> email address is in a "To", "Cc", "Bcc", "Resent-To", "Resent-Cc", or >> "Resent-Bcc" line of the original message. >> >> I cannot see the address for "us...@example.com" in any of those fields, >> or indeed referenced anywhere in the email. Is this a bug, or am I >> misunderstanding something? >> >> Harry >> -- >> Harry Mills Tel: 01749 812100 >> Managing Director Mob: 07815 848818 >> Opendium Ltd. www.opendium.com >> >