-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015, lejeczek wrote:
On 19/06/15 15:13, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
On Jun 19, 2015 9:08 AM, "lejeczek" <pelj...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
I guess this would be a common case, I am hoping for some final
clarification.
a few Linux boxes share ldap (multi-master) backend that PAM/SSSD uses to
authenticated users, and these LDAPs are also is used by Samba, users start
@ uid 1000.
Boxes are in the same both DNS and Samba domains.
Do I treat these users as system or virtual users from postfix/dovecot
perspective?
If it can be a matter of choice then which is better/best?
I would make them virtual users. This way you can abstract and scale
things up. Also your normal users then would not need to have access to
your mail servers; they only access the services.
many thanks.
it can be a tricky for beginner to define those, in old days when one said
system users thought of OS dedicated accounts for daemons/services etc.
In this team of postfix+dovecot, which one decides whether user is
canonical/system or virtual?
Optimally installed, Dovecot provides the user information for Postfix.
- --
Steffen Kaiser
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEVAwUBVYeou3z1H7kL/d9rAQIYqQgAy3FuDLPOn0jvmk6Iua31gSLlL40ghAwB
TxBCVQGsjrnvQF3k3hXtSwopsR9A6jA0ccbUiqHWA7SBUlCHG+ijgOMneEmuaVKa
9bUavKU7SFfRMnCt4VcoSoEodB5g3e7INQyE8dxZ9bWwsshpuHaD/0YUajUtc8/Q
ewhq7U+UGW/VoVCOvJ7SYl9uZ5o8VMZacbngHHA6xN0soeoi+kFCkUjM5iMVWIOw
UzitYvHUCT5TxVtmGF3ynYFtByXzw7dKAoNc0KFZUs5z9h2kBxBhFuCti1tHz9I6
73bPdulAnc/NMgd9HYCpK662mqRsYK406Cbmfqb/1x7Rjm1PmoDYXA==
=IogP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
